| Back to The Collection | Back to Home |
|
The original S&W model 59 was introduced in 1973. I bought one in 1978, when it was still
considered a cutting edge weapon. These pistols had double column magazines
which held 15 rounds, a double action trigger, and an alloy frame. This was
heady stuff back in the seventies. On the other hand, these guns had poor
sights, terrible handling qualities, dismal triggers, and a strange anodized
black finish on their new fangled aluminum frames. I needed to sell my M-59,
about seven years after I bought it, and I had not owned a S&W automatic
for years. The Smith auto has come a long way since that first model. The
aesthetics, and ergonomics of the newer guns are considerably improved. The
gun feels much better in the hand, thanks to the three piece, wraparound
grips, and seems to point better. The newer, one piece grips are said to
be even better. The sights are greatly improved over the originals, and are
set atop a flat milled slide. There are some points in common though. I have
a number of old 15 round magazines from my model 59; these function in the
newer gun perfectly, though they stick out of the bottom a bit. The slide
mounted safety is unchanged, decocking the gun when it is applied, and making
"cocked, and locked" carry impossible. This S&W decocker works in the
opposite direction of the Colt safety (down is safe on the Smith). The trigger
pull is smoother than it was on the older gun, but still very familiar, with
the creep that I have come to associate with all double action auto triggers.
This gun was purchased at a local show, as a companion
to my Marlin Camp Gun. The Marlin is now discontinued, which is a shame.
The Marlin will take the same magazines as the 669 and the rest of the 9mm
Smiths. It will even take the shorter 12 round magazines. In addition
to this, there are now readily available, extended box type magazines which
will hold as many as 30 rounds. The photo to the left shows the 669, loaded with an extended 30 round magazine. The magazine works, and feeds reliably, though it is a bit cumbersome. Actually, this is a pretty silly magazine to use in a pistol. It is a bit more suited to carbine use. These extended magazines are cheap and popular, probably as a reaction to the ten years of the clinton magazine ban. Needless to say, the gun is very awkward to holster, with this magazine in place. Still, if you think that this looks silly, scroll down to the bottom of the page, to see something even sillier. The M-669 is accurate enough, and I can shoot into about 3" with it at the pistol range. This is not great, but it may be me, rather than the gun, as I am not all that familiar with it yet. This is one of the few stainless guns I have. Though I presently favor my Glocks, and my Para-Ordnance pistols, this gun practically insists on being my household defense gun. Smith &Wesson had, for a time, fallen into a certain amount of disfavor with many shooters, because of their collusion with the clinton administration's anti gun agenda. This had caused prices to drop on some models, and even set off a boycott. The company has since been sold by it's anti gun British holding company, to a more gun friendly, and enthusiastic American company. My only question is as to why the British company bought S&W in the first place. S&W was sold at a great loss, and the sale probably qualifies as one of the great corporate bargains of the recent past. The new parent company manufactures gun locks, and is much smaller than it's latest acquisition. This is somewhat reminiscent of a mouse eating a cabbage. Still, the new arrangement seems to be working out well, for both sides. Numerous new models have been introduced, and S&W has recently introduced it's new "X" frame revolver, the first new S&W frame since the introduction of the "L" frame in the seventies. This is also the first frame to eclipse the venerable "N" frame, since it's introduction in the early part of the last century when the big frame was designed. In concert with the introduction of the new frame, S&W has introduced it's first new revolver cartridges since the creation of the .41 Magnum back in 1964. It has also recaptured the title of the most powerful handgun cartridge with the .500 Magnum, and has done so by such a large margin, that it is a title that is unlikely to ever be challenged. I am pleasantly surprised with the 669. I had initially obtained it because I wanted to mate it to my Camp Gun, and because the price was right, but S&W may have produced a better pistol than I gave them credit for. Like many gun owners, I was very disappointed with S&W, during the clinton years. Like many gun owners, I welcome them back under their new, enthusiastic ownership.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||