| Back to Ham | Back to Shack | Back to Home |
|
The SBE Console V
The Pinnacle This unit covers the 40 channel
27mhz band, formerly the ham 11 meter band. The band was taken from ham
operators, back in the fifties, and given over to the new Citizens Band
Radio Service. This was intended as a short range communication service
for the average citizen, who was not technically astute, and had no wish
to be. Power was limited to four watts, and usage was limited to short
duration, non business use. The service was also not to be for hobby use,
or for casual conversation. The initial intention was for the service to
be used for emergencies, or to enhance outdoor activities (hunting, camping,
hiking). A license was required, except for low powered units, putting
out less than half a watt. The service was soon dominated by kids with walkie talkies, and wannabe hams with base stations.
Inside, the unit shows
its high build quality, and the robust design. The unit has a true metal
chassis, not just s circuit board with some framing. It is also designed from
scratch as a base, and is not merely a mobile unit put in a big box (though the
PLL and some of the other modules reside on a board that would fit in a standard
mobile case). The power supply is massive, which would seem to indicate the
potential for replacement of the finals with something more powerful. More
interesting is the possibility of using some of the empty space in side the case
for installation of a small linear, powered off the built in transformer.
The final itself is mounted on a large aluminum plate, which acts as a heat sink. It sits just behind the speaker, and there is more than enough room for a much larger sink. The final used is the now discontinued NEC 2sd180. This final is rated at 60 watts, with a suggested range of 30 to 60 watts, depending upon application. It is no longer available, but replacements are the 2sd428, and 2sd1485 - both rated at around 80 watts. These conservative ratings make for a long life, and for the possibility of raising transmitter power by simple tweaking of the unit. I have considered replacement with a 2sd428, and the addition of a second 2sd428 on a separate board, using some of the empty space in the case. This second board could be switchable. Switched on, this would give the potential of an honest 80 watts conservatively driven, or over 100 watts of RF fully driven. The final is mounted next to its drive, with a large electrolytic capacitor, presumably used as a filter. These are shown in the photo to the right. A small metal retaining unit has been removed from the driver, so that it can be seen better in the photo. These are all mounted rather close to the transformer, so that the major heat producing components are away from the rest of the circuitry. This would also be a natural place to put a cooling fan. If I were to add a linear, this is the area in which it would be mounted.
CB has a fairly low frequency, compared to the FRS/GMRS radios so many of us are using these days. This calls for a rather long antenna. Doing the math, you get a quarter wave radiator length of 8.61 feet, which comes out to a bit over 102". This is the traditional length of a quarter wave whip for CB, though most need to be tuned or trimmed due to coax velocity factor, and installation variance. The 102" length is way too long for the attic crawl space in which I grow my antenna farm. In addition, one of the dirty little secrets of the popular and common quarter wave antenna, is that, of itself, it is only 22% efficient. In base antennas, this is usually dealt with by setting up a ground plane of horizontally oriented radials. In mobile installations, the car body or some other surface is used as a ground. These are attempts to make the quarter wave antenna appear to be a half wave unit. Effectiveness varies. The goal is to make an antenna that emulates a half wave radiator, which has a theoretical efficiency of 100%.
What if I made a halo, oriented it vertically, and then made another halo, also oriented vertically, but at a 90 degree angle? If I connect the feed points of both antennas to a common transmission line, I should get an omnidirectional vertically polarized short antenna. But do I?
near field affects
Near field effects are caused by the fact that the wires and tubes that you think of as your antenna, are not really your antenna at all. they create the field that forms your real antenna. This is done by using the antenna to complete a circuit.
as the field collapses and reforms it causes a disturbance
that travels through space a a series of radio waves.
if you cant get a whole quarter wave into your antenna at once, the field will not be made with all of the power that went into creating the wave in the first place.
sidebander V Trinidad III Malibu 40 sidebander IV
After a number of years of storage, I found there was no modulation on transmit. The radio received fine, and was able to generate a good strong carrier; but no modulation occurred. This did not come as a complete surprise. The SBE radios, like much electronic gear made in the early eighties, were susceptible to failure of electrolytic capacitors after a few decades. SBE also had a bit of a reputation for cold solder joints. These conditions can create unpredictable and sporadic failures. Fortunately, the solution is simple. Capacitors are cheap, so just replace them. Solder joints can be checked. While I was in the radio, I also gave it a good cleaning. The repairs took an entire day, though the actual replacement took under an hour. I first photographed all boards and internals, and then began to snip the electrolytic capacitors from the board, rather than desoldering. This left a bit of the connecting pins, which I used as solder points for the new capacitors. A set of schematics, along with the photos I took, were fo great help. having removed the caps, I verified their values, and then got a new set for a few dollars. For those who wish to do the same thing, I have included photos, schematics, and a parts list. With the caps replaced, the radio works perfectly. Occasionally, resistor and other components might also need replacement; but the caps are always the first things I check. In addition, resoldering of any joints that appear dull or flaked, and a good general cleaning of switches and connectors, completes the job. This would also be the time to add any new features or do mods - legal or illegal. With such a large case, and so much empty room (see photographs) it is tempting to add all kinds of different things to the radio. In my own case, I decided to replace the finals, add a frequency counter, and install an "On The Air" light. The On The Air light was very stupid; but I had to have it. One of my early CB radios was a Radio Shack Navaho TRC-431. It was a simple radio, AM only, without a lot of features; but it did have a green "On The Air" light, and a companion Modulation light. As a teen ager, I thought this was the last word in radio eye candy.
Extra power finals I replaced my driver and finals. This is easier to do than you might think, as long as you keep your expectations reasonable. The new units are not impressively powerful, which suits me just fine. I put out around 25 watts on AM, and perhaps 70 on SSB.
Though I wanted to make this the ultimate CB radio, I have no interest in adding extra channels. Besides being illegal, there is no need for them. There are not many people to talk to on these channels, and the band crowding of the old days of CB is long gone. When I want to talk on other channels, or with significantly more power, I turn off my CB and fire up one of my ham radios. In addition, in this particular radio design, the mod is more trouble than it is worth. Frequency mods, also known as extra channels, are possible, though not as easily accomplished as on some models. The Console V uses a pair of chips as a PLL to synthesize frequencies. The MC14526 is a 4bit ÷N programmable counter. The MC14568 is a phase comparator/programmable binary counter. Combined they make up a 8 bit binary counter. In latter designs, these chips were replaced by a single NDC40013. While some radios, notably the old Cobras and many Radio Shack models, were easy to modify, the SBE is not. Rather than simply shorting together pins on the PLL chip, the SBE radios require a pair of switches and a bit of wiring, to remix the crystals in the mixer. This gives 82 extra channels (for a total of 122), and essentially continuous coverage from 26.520 to 27.725. This is a small board that is mounted inside the case, and connects to the PLL circuit in place of one of the original reference crystals. There are a couple of versions of this board. One holds four crystals and an oscillator, while the other holds six crystals.
Still, for anyone tempted to add extra frequencies, I strongly recommend getting a ham license. This license will allow you to legally talk on the nearby 10 meter band, which is where many of the "extra" channels on CB are located. With a ham license, you will be able to legally use up to 1500(!) watts. You will also be able to use many other bands at higher and lower frequencies.
There is not really very much information out there about these great old radios. This is a shame, but not a surprise. I picked my radio up new in 1977. This is the only production year given, and it is possible these were not made for very long, or sold in very great number. I paid a bit over $200 for mine, and I recall that the guy who sold it to me got into a bit of trouble with his boss, because he gave it to me at dealer cost. These were typically selling for $300 - $400 back in the seventies.
RFX-75. The KL203 is cheaper and I can use it on more than one
radio. |
Virtually all CBs use a conventional RF amplifier/mixer "Front-end" in their receiver which is susceptible to overload (bleedover) from strong stations. Stoner has eliminated the RF amplifier and employed a Schottky diode mixer similar to that used in commercial SSB radiotelephones.
Model Y7040
if you put the 135 foot off center dipole up, you will be thanking yourself up
and down for years. Because I'm kicking myself for not getting one of these up
earlier. I have a very good 40 meter antenna I had at 28 feet, and this off
center beats the L out of it. I talk of 15, 10, 20, 40, 60, 17, 12, 80, 75, and
160 meters with this antenna. YES!! 160 meters. It doesn't do a great job down
there, but I can get with some stations and I have an amp. I consistently have
one of the better signals out there, and that's not bad living in a trailer
park.
Oh, almost forgot. One leg on your antenna is 90' and the other is 45'. and of
course the shield goes to the 45' side.
Just to demonstrate the point, I compared the azimuth patterns
of a horizontal Cobweb element (a half-wave dipole bent into a square) at 30ft
over rocky ground with a quarter-wave vertical. I chose the Cobweb because it's
quite close to being omnidirectional. I used zero wire loss and Mininec ground
to produce 100% antenna efficiencies.
I overlaid the azimuth patterns for the two antennas at take-off angles from 90
degrees down to 10 degrees in 10 degree steps. Here are the results:
90 deg: Cobweb always massively superior - no signal from vertical
80 deg: Cobweb 12dB better at all azimuth angles
70 deg: Cobweb between 6dB and 7.5dB better at all azimuth angles
60 deg: Cobweb between 5dB and 6dB better at all azimuth angles
50 deg: Cobweb between 4dB and 6dB better at all azimuth angles
40 deg: Cobweb between 3dB and 6B better at all azimuth angles
30 deg: Cobweb between 6dB and 7.5dB better at all azimuth angles
20 deg: Cobweb between 1dB and 5dB better at all azimuth angles
10 deg: Cobweb better than the vertical over 73% of the azimuth by up to 2.5dB;
vertical better than the Cobweb over 27% of the azimuth by up to 1dB
Modification is done by using an external oscillator to
replace the doubled 20 MHz mixing signal coming from the 10 MHz reference
divider.