Back to Ham Back to Shack Back to Home

The SBE Console V

Manual *********** Antenna
Specs Repair/Mods Links

The Pinnacle

    Though this is not, strictly speaking, a ham radio, the Console was my first SSB base transceiver. It is a CB rig, but it is a deluxe one. This is sometimes also listed as the SBE Console 5. In its day (early to mid eighties) this was one of the best CB radios you could get – it still is. Along with the Trams, Brownings, and the legendary Stoner, this was a CB radio made to the same standards as a good quality ham radio.

        This unit covers the 40 channel 27mhz band, formerly the ham 11 meter band. The band was taken from ham operators, back in the fifties, and given over to the new Citizens Band Radio Service. This was intended as a short range communication service for the average citizen, who was not technically astute, and had no wish to be. Power was limited to four watts, and usage was limited to short duration, non business use. The service was also not to be for hobby use, or for casual conversation. The initial intention was for the service to be used for emergencies, or to enhance outdoor activities (hunting, camping, hiking). A license was required, except for low powered units, putting out less than half a watt. The service was soon dominated by kids with walkie talkies, and wannabe hams with base stations.
       During the CB craze of the seventies/eighties, I purchased one of the new 40 channel mobiles, and then picked up the Console V. I have had this unit for almost thirty years. This was also when I began to consider ham radio, and when I finally got my CB license. About four months after I got my license, the FCC ruled that a license was no longer required. The CB craze actually ruined CB. Such was the popularity, that enforcement of rules became impossible. The service was left to unlicensed operators, and restrictions are ignored, unless an operator interferes with TV, radio, or some other service.
        This was a pretty unusual unit, in terms of quality and features. Despite the spirit and regulation against hobbyist use, this is plainly a radio for a hobbyist, who takes CB radio very seriously. The unit has a wooden case, a heavy duty metal chassis, and can be adjusted and peaked by the user. I immediately replaced the stock, mobile style mike, with a Mura, noise cancelling, power mike. In its initial installation, this radio fed into a Starduster antenna, on a 20' mast, on the roof of our two story town house. On top of all of this, we lived on a hill. I could get anywhere in the Milwaukee metro area on that radio, with that antenna system. When I was operating my base, I used the handle of Starbase, both because of my Starduster antenna, and because I was a bit of a Star Trek enthusiast - hey, it was the late seventies/early eighties, and I was still in my teens.
        For seventeen years, I lived in an apartment on the East Side of Milwaukee. I was unable to use the Starduster antenna at that location, and instead used a 5/8 wave groundless antenna, meant for marine use. This antenna was mounted on an outside balcony rail, and gave great service from my third floor apartment, though not as good as that given by the old Starduster. At my current location, I use a home made wire antenna. it is of groundplane design and is mounted in my attic crawl space. This is presently the largest of all of my antennas, or at any rate the most obtrusive.
       The Console V is a forty channel unit, which is capable of being used in AM or SSB mode. The SSB mode gives it a practical selection of 120 channels. Transmitting on the sidebands also triples the effective power of the transmission. This was one of the more expensive CB radios on the market, and was up to the quality of many of the better ham radios. It has a number of scan, and program features, and has built in indicators for SWR, as well as transmitted, and received power. The transmit and receive are excellent, as is the construction of the unit. This was a product of the heyday of CB radio, when it's popularity caused it to be taken very seriously by equipment manufacturers. The unit can be operated on 12 volts or off of household current.

        Inside, the unit shows its high build quality, and the robust design.  The unit has a true metal chassis, not just s circuit board with some framing. It is also designed from scratch as a base, and is not merely a mobile unit put in a big box (though the PLL and some of the other modules reside on a board that would fit in a standard mobile case). The power supply is massive, which would seem to indicate the potential for replacement of the finals with something more powerful. More interesting is the possibility of using some of the empty space in side the case for installation of a small linear, powered off the built in transformer.

        The final itself is mounted on a large aluminum plate, which acts as a heat sink. It sits just behind the speaker, and there is more than enough room for a much larger sink. The final used is the now discontinued NEC 2sd180.  This final is rated at 60 watts, with a suggested range of 30 to 60 watts, depending upon application. It is no longer available, but replacements are the 2sd428, and 2sd1485 - both rated at around 80 watts. These conservative ratings make for a long life, and for the possibility of raising transmitter power by simple tweaking of the unit.

        I have considered replacement with a 2sd428, and the addition of a second 2sd428 on a separate board, using some of the empty space in the case. This second board could be switchable. Switched on, this would give the potential of an honest 80 watts conservatively driven, or over 100 watts of RF fully driven.

         The final is mounted next to its drive, with a large electrolytic capacitor, presumably used as a filter. These are shown in the photo to the right. A small metal retaining unit has been removed from the driver, so that it can be seen better in the photo. These are all mounted rather close to the transformer, so that the major heat producing components are away from the rest of the circuitry. This would also be a natural place to put a cooling fan. If I were to add a linear, this is the area in which it would be mounted.

 

 

Antenna

        CB has a fairly low frequency, compared to the FRS/GMRS radios so many of us are using these days. This calls for a rather long antenna. Doing the math, you get a quarter wave radiator length of 8.61 feet, which comes out to a bit over 102". This is the traditional length of a quarter wave whip for CB, though most need to be tuned or trimmed due to coax velocity factor, and installation variance.

        The 102" length is way too long for the attic crawl space in which I grow my antenna farm. In addition, one of the dirty little secrets of the popular and common quarter wave antenna, is that, of itself, it is only 22% efficient. In base antennas, this is usually dealt with by setting up a ground plane of horizontally oriented radials. In mobile installations, the car body or some other surface is used as a ground. These are attempts to make the quarter wave antenna appear to be a half wave unit. Effectiveness varies. The goal is to make an antenna that emulates a half wave radiator, which has a theoretical efficiency of 100%.

 

 

What if I made a halo, oriented it vertically, and then made another halo, also oriented vertically, but at a 90 degree angle? If I connect the feed points of both antennas to a common transmission line, I should get an omnidirectional vertically polarized short antenna. But do I?

 

 

near field affects

 

        Near field effects are caused by the fact that the wires and tubes that you think of as your antenna, are not really your antenna at all. they create the field that forms your real antenna. This is done by using the antenna to complete a circuit.

 

as the field collapses and reforms it causes a disturbance that travels through space a a series of radio waves.

 

 

if you cant get a whole quarter wave into your antenna at once, the field will not be made with all of the power that went into creating the wave in the first place.

 

 

 

 

 

sidebander V

Trinidad III

Malibu 40

sidebander IV

 

 

 


 

Specs

Model

SBE Console V

Frequency Range

26.965 - 27.405 MHz (40 Channels)

Emission Modes

AM/USB/LSB

Frequency Control

Phase Lock Loop (PLL) Synthesizer

Frequency Tolerance

0.005 %**

Frequency Stability

0.001 %**

Operating Temperature Range

-30°C to +50°C**

Microphone

Dynamic PTT, 500 Ohms

Input Voltage (DC/AC Selectable)

13.8V DC / 110V AC 60Hz

Current Drain: Transmit (AM full mod.)

< 3.5A**

Current Drain : Receive (Squelched)

£ 0.5A**

Current Drain : Receive (Max. audio output)

< 1A**

Antenna Connector

UHF; SO239

Dimensions

6"H x 18"W x 12"D

Weight

12 lb.**

TRANSMITTER

 

RF Power Output

AM : 4W / SSB : 12W PEP

RF Transmit Modes

AM/SSB

Modulation

High and Low level Class B, Amplitude Modulation : AM and SSB

Spurious Emissions

-60 dB**

Carrier Suppression

-60 dB**

Audio Frequency Response

300 to 2500 Hz**

Antenna Impedance

50 Ohms

Output Indicators

Meter shows relative signal strength, RF output power, SWR and AM Modulation level. Transmit LED glows red when transmitter is in operation.

RECEIVER

 

Sensitivity for 10dB S/N (AM/ SSB)

< 0.5 mV / < 0.15 mV**

IF Frequency

AM: 10.695 MHz 1st IF, 455 KHz 2nd IF

Image Rejection

-50 dB**

Adjacent Channel Selectivity

-60 dB**

RF Gain Control

45 dB adjustable for optimum signal reception**

Automatic Gain Control (AGC) Figure of Merit

100 mV for 10 dB Change in Audio Output**

Squelch

Adjustable; threshold less than 0.5 mV**

Noise Blanker

RF type**

Audio Output Power

2.5W @ 10% THD**

Audio Frequency Response

300 to 2500 Hz**

Built-in Speaker

8 Ohms, 4 Watts**

External Speaker (Not Supplied)

8 Ohms, 4 Watts**

 

Repair/Mods

        After a number of years of storage, I found there was no modulation on transmit. The radio received fine, and was able to generate a good strong carrier; but no modulation occurred. This did not come as a complete surprise. The SBE radios, like much electronic gear made in the early eighties, were susceptible to failure of electrolytic capacitors after a few decades. SBE also had a bit of a reputation for cold solder joints. These conditions can create unpredictable and sporadic failures. Fortunately, the solution is simple. Capacitors are cheap, so just replace them. Solder joints can be checked. While I was in the radio, I also gave it a good cleaning.

         The repairs took an entire day, though the actual replacement took under an hour. I first photographed all boards and internals, and then began to snip the electrolytic capacitors from the board, rather than desoldering. This left a bit of the connecting pins, which I used as solder points for the new capacitors. A set of schematics, along with the photos I took, were fo great help. having removed the caps, I verified their values, and then got a new set for a few dollars. For those who wish to do the same thing, I have included photos, schematics, and a parts list.

        With the caps replaced, the radio works perfectly. Occasionally, resistor and other components might also need replacement; but the caps are always the first things I check. In addition, resoldering of any joints that appear dull or flaked, and a good general cleaning of switches and connectors, completes the job. This would also be the time to add any new features or do mods - legal or illegal.

        With such a large case, and so much empty room (see photographs) it is tempting to add all kinds of different things to the radio. In my own case, I decided to replace the finals, add a frequency counter, and install an "On The Air" light. The On The Air light was very stupid; but I had to have it. One of my early CB radios was a Radio Shack Navaho TRC-431. It was a simple radio, AM only, without a lot of features; but it did have a green "On The Air" light, and a companion Modulation light. As a teen ager, I thought this was the last word in radio eye candy.

 

        Extra power finals I replaced my driver and finals. This is easier to do than you might think, as long as you keep your expectations reasonable. The new units are not impressively powerful, which suits me just fine. I put out around 25 watts on AM, and perhaps 70 on SSB.

 

 

        Though I wanted to make this the ultimate CB radio, I have no interest in adding extra channels. Besides being illegal, there is no need for them. There are not many people to talk to on these channels, and the band crowding of the old days of CB is long gone. When I want to talk on other channels, or with significantly more power, I turn off my CB and fire up one of my ham radios. In addition, in this particular radio design, the mod is more trouble than it is worth.

        Frequency mods, also known as extra channels, are possible, though not as easily accomplished as on some models. The Console V uses a pair of chips as a PLL to  synthesize frequencies. The MC14526 is a 4bit ÷N programmable counter. The MC14568 is a phase comparator/programmable binary counter. Combined they make up a 8 bit binary counter. In latter designs, these chips were replaced by a single NDC40013.

        While some radios, notably the old Cobras and many Radio Shack models, were easy to modify, the SBE is not. Rather than simply shorting together pins on the PLL chip, the SBE radios require a pair of switches and a bit of wiring, to remix the crystals in the mixer. This gives 82 extra channels (for a total of 122), and essentially continuous coverage from 26.520 to 27.725.

        This is a small board that is mounted inside the case, and connects to the PLL circuit in place of one of the original reference crystals. There are a couple of versions of this board. One holds four crystals and an oscillator, while the other holds six crystals.

       

        Still, for anyone tempted to add extra frequencies, I strongly recommend getting a ham license.  This license will allow you to legally talk on the nearby 10 meter band, which is where many of the "extra" channels on CB are located. With a ham license, you will be able to legally use up to 1500(!) watts. You will also be able to use many other bands at higher and lower frequencies.

 

 

 

Links

There is not really very much information out there about these great old radios. This is a shame, but not a surprise. I picked my radio up new in 1977. This is the only production year given, and it is possible these were not made for very long, or sold in very great number. I paid a bit over $200 for mine, and I recall that the guy who sold it to me got into a bit of trouble with his boss, because he gave it to me at dealer cost. These were typically selling for $300 - $400 back in the seventies.

 

RFX-75. The KL203 is cheaper and I can use it on more than one radio.
IRF520 MOSFET

Virtually all CBs use a conventional RF amplifier/mixer "Front-end" in their receiver which is susceptible to overload (bleedover) from strong stations. Stoner has eliminated the RF amplifier and employed a Schottky diode mixer similar to that used in commercial SSB radiotelephones.

Model Y7040

 if you put the 135 foot off center dipole up, you will be thanking yourself up and down for years. Because I'm kicking myself for not getting one of these up earlier. I have a very good 40 meter antenna I had at 28 feet, and this off center beats the L out of it. I talk of 15, 10, 20, 40, 60, 17, 12, 80, 75, and 160 meters with this antenna. YES!! 160 meters. It doesn't do a great job down there, but I can get with some stations and I have an amp. I consistently have one of the better signals out there, and that's not bad living in a trailer park.

Oh, almost forgot. One leg on your antenna is 90' and the other is 45'. and of course the shield goes to the 45' side.

 

Just to demonstrate the point, I compared the azimuth patterns of a horizontal Cobweb element (a half-wave dipole bent into a square) at 30ft over rocky ground with a quarter-wave vertical. I chose the Cobweb because it's quite close to being omnidirectional. I used zero wire loss and Mininec ground to produce 100% antenna efficiencies.

I overlaid the azimuth patterns for the two antennas at take-off angles from 90 degrees down to 10 degrees in 10 degree steps. Here are the results:

90 deg: Cobweb always massively superior - no signal from vertical
80 deg: Cobweb 12dB better at all azimuth angles
70 deg: Cobweb between 6dB and 7.5dB better at all azimuth angles
60 deg: Cobweb between 5dB and 6dB better at all azimuth angles
50 deg: Cobweb between 4dB and 6dB better at all azimuth angles
40 deg: Cobweb between 3dB and 6B better at all azimuth angles
30 deg: Cobweb between 6dB and 7.5dB better at all azimuth angles
20 deg: Cobweb between 1dB and 5dB better at all azimuth angles
10 deg: Cobweb better than the vertical over 73% of the azimuth by up to 2.5dB; vertical better than the Cobweb over 27% of the azimuth by up to 1dB

 

Modification is done by using an external oscillator to replace the doubled 20 MHz mixing signal coming from the 10 MHz reference divider.